Silicon Power US70 NVMe SSD review: Surprisingly good real-world performance - platzlogy2000

At a Glance

Expert's Military rank

Pros

• Excellent sustained transfer times
• Affordable price
• Generous 5-year warranty and TBW rating

Cons

• Passably performance with queued, threaded lilliputian files

Our Verdict

The Atomic number 14 Power US70 NVMe SSD wrong-side-out in precise good real-international transfer results, and decent a posteriori benchmark scores. For the price it's a solid deal.

The US70 is our first looking at at a Si Power SSD, and we likable the view. It's not a top-tier drive, but it's not priced like information technology either, and our 2TB look back unit turned some squeamish examine scores. This push on is a solid value.

This recapitulation is divide of our on-going roundup of the best SSDs. Go there for information happening competitory products and how we tested them.

Design and features

The US70 is a mid-priced SSD in the common 22mm-wide, 80mm-unsound, M.2 physical format. The connector is M.2, and it supports the PCIe 4.x that's mutual on AMD systems and few newer Intel laptops and motherboards. The NAND is 96-layer TLC; astir to a third will be stained as SLC for caching. There's also 1GB of DRAM for every 1TB of capacity. The controller on the 2TB unit we tested is a Phison E16.

Silicon Power

Atomic number 14 Power's retail box for the 2TB version of the US70 PCIe 4.x NVMe SSD.

The US70 was available at the time of this writing in two capacities: 1TB ($175 on AmazonOff non-product link) and the 2TB we tried and true ($320 on Amazon). The warrant period is five age, and the TBW (TeraBytes Written over the life of the drive) ratings are an extremely generous 1,800 for every 1TB of capacity.

What's non guaranteed is that the SSD components leave remain the same over time. Si Baron retains the right to switch these arsenic needs be, with the proviso that performance will meet what the company specifies in advertising. Spell this practice is common, some companies fall short in maintaining performance levels, as the story referenced above explains.

Performance

The US70 we tested is a very good performer—non record-stage setting, but fast enough for most users. Via PCIe 4 it in reality bested the snappy Seagate FireCuda 520 in sequential throughput.

IDG

The US70 turned in a smooth operation under CrystalDiskMark 6. Longer bars are better.

IT did quite well in our real-world 48GB transfers as well, though not along a equivalence with the Samsung 980 Pro. Then again, the US70 is hardly alone in that regard.

IDG

The US70 couldn't equalise the Samsung 980 Pro in our real world transfers, but few drives do.

American Samoa often of the difference between top-tier and lesser SSDs these days is in the queued, threaded small file performance, from here on in we'll represent including the CrystalDiskMark 4K Book of Numbers. As you can see at a lower place, the pricier drives come alive when more one thread is interested.

IDG

You can see here wherefore you pay more for SSDs such as the Samsung 980 Pro and Seagate FireCuda 520. But that doesn't make the US70 a domestic dog, just a mid-range drive. Yearner bars are better.

Our 450GB write test is simply to date how very much secondary cache is allotted. When drives run out, this issue will get yearner in a hurry. We've seen as high as 17 or 18 minutes happening some cheap NVMe SSDs.

IDG

Shorter bars are better in our 450GB write test.

As the 2TB US70 we tested was meaningless and had approximately 666GB assigned equally secondary cache, it never ran out during the 450GB try. The 1TB flavor would stimulate 333GB of cache and would run out before the end. If it behaves like other similar Phison designs, write speed will throw to around 700MBps and post a time around 400-450 seconds. Some the Samsung 980 Pro and Seagate FireCuda 520 to which I'm comparing the US70 are 1TB SSDs, so keep that in mind if you're shopping at the 1TB level.

The PCIe 3 tests utilized Windows 10 64-routine moving on a Core i7-5820K/Asus X99 Deluxe system with four 16GB Kingston 2666MHz DDR4 modules, a Zotac (NVidia) GT 710 1GB x2 PCIe graphics card, and an Asmedia ASM2142 USB 3.1 card. Information technology also contains a Gigabyte GC-Mountain range Thunderbolt 3 card, and Softperfect Ramdisk 3.4.6 for the 48GB read and write tests.

The PCIe 4 testing was finished on an MSI MEG X570 motherboard socketing an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-nucleus CPU, using the same Kingston DRAM, cards, and software. All testing is performed on an empty, or nearly empty drive. Execution wish decrease equally the drive fills up.

Note: As Silicon Tycoo doesn't guarantee that the drive you buy testament have the components we tested, take our figures every bit ballpark. Run CrystalDiskMark 6 when you install the drive, and provide for your own system's performance before drawing any conclusions.

Close

This US70 is a very good NVMe SSD. It's not going to give Samsung's 980 Pro any worries, but it's Eastern Samoa fast general as anything at a similar price and likely far faster than almost users need. Merely make sure yours performs as ours did when you grow IT home.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/393743/silicon-power-us70-nvme-ssd-review-surprisingly-good-real-world-performance.html

Posted by: platzlogy2000.blogspot.com

Share this post